GearHead Forum
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
SMF - Just Installed!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
GearHead Forum
»
General Category
»
General Discussion
»
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Author
Topic: why linux would always win in a cage match against windows (Read 2051 times)
Erathoniel
Hero Member
Posts: 1122
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #30 on:
May 01, 2008, 08:00:18 PM »
WMP Classic? I've been using iTunes for simplicity.
I have no clue what I use for midi's. I honestly do not know.
Logged
macksting
Hero Member
Posts: 1085
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #31 on:
May 01, 2008, 08:10:06 PM »
I've been thinking my MIDI problem most likely has to do with my on-board sound card. When I think about it, even Windows had trouble playing MIDIs on my machine. It's play them, but there was an incongruously loud BLAT! sound before each one.
Logged
Keiseth
Full Member
Posts: 103
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #32 on:
May 02, 2008, 01:29:20 PM »
If I remember correctly, MIDI doesn't work by default in Linux, right? I swear I saw a thread once somewhere that detailed how to get it working...
Is this link:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/MIDI-HOWTO.html
Of any help to you? I bumped into it on Google while looking for said thread.
Logged
Erathoniel
Hero Member
Posts: 1122
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #33 on:
May 02, 2008, 03:10:00 PM »
Wouldn't the MIDI thing depend on distro?
I'd think Ubuntu would have MIDI support, and I know that one of my LiveCD's, if it supported audio, would do MIDI's (through a MIDI editor, if nothing else).
Logged
Epsilon
Full Member
Posts: 241
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #34 on:
May 04, 2008, 08:33:36 PM »
Quoting: Erathoniel
WMP Classic? I've been using iTunes for simplicity.
Not WMP Classic, Media Player Classic - it's not really that great for music, no playlists. Then again, iTunes isn't that wonderful either - I prefer WinAmp, less of a footprint.
Of course, someone will tell us to use foobar2000 or something instead.
Logged
macksting
Hero Member
Posts: 1085
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #35 on:
May 04, 2008, 09:54:02 PM »
But foobar2000 is really good! It's open source because the programmers released it open source before the rights to the foobar franchise were bought out by Microsol, so it won't blow up suns like foobar2007!
Screw Microsol, and screw Gencore, too. Open source all the way.
Logged
Onisuzume
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 562
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #36 on:
May 05, 2008, 10:46:12 AM »
Quoting: Epsilon
(Also, use Media Player Classic: it's essentially an updated WMP with the old interface. I use it for movies and the like.)
Yeah, its awesome.
I got mine with the
CCCP(Combined Community Codec Pack)
and it should also support playlists, as well as shuffle and the like.
And the overly important repeat forever function.
Logged
Erathoniel
Hero Member
Posts: 1122
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows
«
Reply #37 on:
May 05, 2008, 04:49:02 PM »
I use VLC primarily. It works well, is open-source, and cross-platform.
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
« previous
next »
GearHead Forum
»
General Category
»
General Discussion
»
why linux would always win in a cage match against windows